Just when you think there cannot be anymore lies and deceptions from these two bloated, money wasting alphabet agencies and big pharma.
Way before Covid showed up many might have missed the MSM and numerus article, seemingly innocuous, meme like “Stay in you lane!” “Trust the experts!” Trust the experts!" Later came “We’re all in this together!”
This served two of there major goals, it was all deception and propaganda of course, priming you for what they long new was coming and maintaining the docility they so desperately needed you to have.
And do you sense a bit of passing the blame?
“Data on how parts of a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine spread in the bodies of mice were withheld from regulatory submissions to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, according to a new comparison of those submissions and similar documents sent to Japanese regulators.
Byram Bridle, who has a PhD in immunology and is an associate professor of immunology and virology at the University of Guelph in Canada, authored the comparison. It was dated Aug. 13 and released on Oct. 4 by Dr. Robert Malone, a vaccine adviser to the U.S. government.
“The findings of this report raise serious questions about the integrity of the health regulatory process during the declared COVID-19 pandemic,” Bridle said in his conclusions.
During a September meeting, under questioning by Malone, a Pfizer representative said that its studies of the spread of vaccine elements, known as biodistribution, were done in consultation with the FDA.
“Pfizer does not have a further comment other than we did our work in close consultation with the FDA on all our of biodistribution studies that were approved for our licensed product,” the representative said.
Data on how parts of a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine spread in the bodies of mice were withheld from regulatory submissions to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, according to a new comparison of those submissions and similar documents sent to Japanese regulators.
Byram Bridle, who has a PhD in immunology and is an associate professor of immunology and virology at the University of Guelph in Canada, authored the comparison. It was dated Aug. 13 and released on Oct. 4 by Dr. Robert Malone, a vaccine adviser to the U.S. government.
“The findings of this report raise serious questions about the integrity of the health regulatory process during the declared COVID-19 pandemic,” Bridle said in his conclusions.
During a September meeting, under questioning by Malone, a Pfizer representative said that its studies of the spread of vaccine elements, known as biodistribution, were done in consultation with the FDA.
“Pfizer does not have a further comment other than we did our work in close consultation with the FDA on all our of biodistribution studies that were approved for our licensed product,” the representative said.
As Zachary Stieber details below, Malone told The Epoch Times that the images in the submissions appear to have been manipulated “to hide the fact that the biodistribution was much broader than the initial narrative that was promoted, which is that it stays at the site of injection and draining lymph nodes.” More
He added: “That was clearly a lie, and it was a lie that we now know was supported by editing data that were presented to the FDA. And, according to what the Pfizer representative stated, that editing of data was done in cooperation and consultation between Pfizer and the FDA. That is completely unacceptable.”
Pfizer, BioNTech, and the FDA did not respond to requests for comment.
Edited Data
Pfizer and Moderna did not carry out human biodistribution studies before the FDA cleared their messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines in late 2020. They tested the spread of mRNA in animals.
Pfizer and BioNTech tested a surrogate product containing modified RNA, or modRNA, and luciferase, a bioluminescent enzyme found in fireflies, in mice and rats. The distribution was tracked over nine days, according to documents released by the FDA in 2022 under court order.
“Highest signal was detected at the first time points after immunization at the injection site and the signal declined slowly over time until day 9,” the BioNTech report on the mice study stated. The testing “showed limited drainage to the liver,” but no signal was detected 48 hours after immunization, according to the report.
“Dr. Robert Malone, a member of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, in Atlanta, Ga., on June 25, 2025. Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images
“A single picture from imaging of the mice was included in that section of the report, which was sent to the FDA in 2020. Additional images, with more of the mice bodies included, were provided in filings to Japanese regulators. The images showed that the mRNA spread to the rodents’ kidneys and adrenal glands, Bridle said in his analysis. He also said the luminescence was toned down in the FDA document.
“The image in the FDA’s version of the common technical document appears to be a version of the image from the Japanese document that was manipulated in numerous ways, potentially to discourage discovery that they are one and the same,” Bridle stated. “It was then cropped to hide clear evidence of systemic biodistribution of the modRNA vaccine.”
“All of the images sent to American and Japanese regulators cut off at least 25 percent of the mice bodies, including their heads, which prevented any conclusions being made about potential spread to the brain, Bridle said.
Unredacted Image
The BioNTech report stated that after 9 days, the luminescence signal had dropped to background levels.
BioNTech included a graph to support the statement. The lower portion of the graph, representing mice that received a buffer control, was unredacted by the FDA. The rest of the graph, showing levels in mice that received the modRNA product, was redacted.
The same graph was included without redaction in documents released by Japanese regulators. The full graph showed that the levels in vaccine recipients started high and did not reach background levels after 9 days, Bridle said.
“Based on the data from the Japanese document, the claim in the FDA’s report that ‘After 9 d, the reporter expression dropped to background levels’ appears to be a bald-faced lie that was facilitated by redacting data to avoid scrutiny and then hoping nobody would realize that non-redacted data had previously been released by Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency,” Bridle wrote.
He also said that it appeared that the experiments were preliminary and rushed, due to the graph missing typical information, such as error bars.
“The regulatory scientist(s) that reviewed these data should have requested that the study be repeated with an extended timeline and with sufficient experimental replicates until proper statistical analyses revealed a timepoint at which the luciferase signal in the immunized group was no longer statistically different from the background signal in the sham-
How parts of a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine spread in the bodies of mice were withheld from regulatory submissions to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, according to a new comparison of those submissions and similar documents sent to Japanese regulators.
Byram Bridle, who has a PhD in immunology and is an associate professor of immunology and virology at the University of Guelph in Canada, authored the comparison. It was dated Aug. 13 and released on Oct. 4 by Dr. Robert Malone, a vaccine adviser to the U.S. government.
“The findings of this report raise serious questions about the integrity of the health regulatory process during the declared COVID-19 pandemic,” Bridle said in his conclusions.
During a September meeting, under questioning by Malone, a Pfizer representative said that its studies of the spread of vaccine elements, known as biodistribution, were done in consultation with the FDA.
“Pfizer does not have a further comment other than we did our work in close consultation with the FDA on all our of biodistribution studies that were approved for our licensed product,” the representative said.